If all the statements marked I, II and III are true, then which one of the following is logically deduced. Marked the options which is logically most weakly supported. I. Some rich man are Philanthropists. II. No person is a thief. III. No good person who are Philanthropists are thieves.
A :
No good people who are philanthropists are thieves.
B :
No rich people who are good is a thief.
C :
All rich people are good and philanthropists.
D :
No rich people who are thieves are philanthropists.
The question given below has a set of four statements.Each statement has three segments.Choose the alternative where the third segment in the statement can be logically deduced using both the preceding two, but not from one of them.
I. No cowboys laugh. Some who laugh are sphinxes. Some sphinxes are not cowboys. II. All ghosts are florescent. Some ghosts do not sing. Some singers are not florescent. III. Cricketers indulge in swearing. Those who swear are hanged. Some who are hanged are not cricketers. IV. Some crazy people are pianists. All crazy people are whistlers. Some whistlers are pianists.
Answer: C In statement I it is given that no cowboys laugh and some who laughs are sphinxes. Hence it is clear that some sphinxes are common to laugh are not cowboys. From the figure it is clear that some crazy will be pianists.
Q. No. 3:
The question given below has a set of four statements.Each statement has
three segments.Choose the alternative where the third segment in the
statement can be logically deduced using both the preceding two, but not
from one of them.
I. All good people are knights. All warriors are good people. All knights are warriors.
II. No footballers are ministers. All footballer are tough. Some ministers are players.
III. All pizzas are snacks. Some meals are pizzas. Some meals are snacks.
IV. Some barkers are musk deer. All barkers are sloth bears. Some sloth bears are musk deer.
Answer: A It is therefore clear that some meals are snacks. It is clear that some barkers are musk deer.
Q. No. 4:
The question given below has a set of four statements.Each statement has
three segments.Choose the alternative where the third segment in the
statement can be logically deduced using both the preceding two, but not
from one of them.
I. Dinosaurs are prehistoric creatures. Water-buffaloes are not dinosaurs. Water-buffaloes are not prehistoric creatures.
II. All politicians are frank. No frank people are crocodiles. No crocodiles are politicians.
III. No diamond is quartz. No opal is quartz. Diamonds are opals.
IV. All monkeys like banana. Some GI joes like bananas. Some GI joes are monkeys.
Answer: B It is clear that if no frank people are crocodiles, then no crocodiles will be politicians.
Q. No. 5:
The question given below has a set of four statements.Each statement has
three segments.Choose the alternative where the third segment in the
statement can be logically deduced using both the preceding two, but not
from one of them.
I. MD is an actor. Some actors are pretty. MD is pretty.
II. Some men are cops. All cops are brave. Some brave people are cops.
III. All actors are brave. Some men are cops. Some men are brave.
IV. All actors are pretty. MD is not an actor. MD is not pretty.
Answer: B Shaded region common to all the three circles show our condition "Some brave people are cops".
Q. No. 6:
The question given below has a set of four statements.Each statement has
three segments.Choose the alternative where the third segment in the
statement can be logically deduced using both the preceding two, but not
from one of them.
I. All IIMs are in India. No BIMs are in India. No IIMs are BIMs.
II. All IIMs are in India. No BIMs are in India. No BIMs are IIMs.
III. Some IIMs are not in India. Some BIMs are not in India. Some IIMs are BIMs.
IV. Some IIMs are not in India. BIMs are not in India. Some BIMs are IIMs.
